The Yogi government recommends a CBI probe into the Ayush admission scam | Tech US News


The Uttar Pradesh government has recommended a CBI probe into the Ayush admission scam.

Confirming the development, an official spokesperson said, “Following Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s orders, the case of admission irregularities in Ayush colleges has been referred to the CBI.”

At least 12 per cent of the admissions to government Ayush colleges for the academic session 2021-22 could be fake as a scam related to the counseling process has surfaced.

There are 7338 seats in various government and private Ayush universities in the country, out of which 891 have come under the lens.

The anomalies were flagged by the Union Ayush Ministry last week.

After an internal investigation, the director of Ayurvedic services of UP prof. SN Singh filed the FIR on Saturday.

In its FIR, the department named UPTRON Limited, Gomti Nagar, its sales company Soft Solution Private Limited and company representative Kuldeep Singh, who were reported for the anomalies.

The three parties were charged with criminal conspiracy (Section 120 B), dishonesty (420), forgery with intent to defraud (468), fraudulently or dishonestly using any document as genuine (471) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). .

The state government has suspended four officials in connection with the Ayush admission and counseling scam.

The UP Police has formed a special team to investigate the matter.

The complainant alleged that the nominated organizations/persons were asked to conduct online counseling based on the merit of the National Entrance Eligibility Test (NEET). But the representative allegedly falsified the information obtained from the directorate, which led to the admission of unsuitable candidates, he alleged.

A departmental inquiry revealed that in many cases the natural order of merit was not followed. Moreover, in some cases selected students did not appear for NEET at all.

It is believed that the company has been working on a shortened merit list to accommodate its candidates.

Meanwhile, the Director General of Medical Education and Training (DGME), trusting the counseling records provided by the designated agency, continued to admit the candidates.

But eventually, when the anomalies surfaced, the director general’s office called the company to investigate the matter. He claimed that the company resorted to deception and corrupted the database to avoid problems.


Source link

Please disable your adblocker or whitelist this site!